ISO8601 vs Millis as Date-Time transfer

Docspell Documentation

Context and Problem Statement🔗

The question is whether the REST Api should return an ISO8601 formatted string in UTC timezone, or the unix time (number of milliseconds since 1970-01-01).

There is quite some controversy about it.

In my opinion, the ISO8601 format (always UTC) is better. The reason is the better readability. But elm folks are on the other side:

One can convert from an ISO8601 date-time string in UTC time into the epoch millis and vice versa. So it is the same to me. There is no less information in a ISO8601 string than in the epoch millis.

To avoid confusion, all date/time values should use the same encoding.

Decision Outcome🔗

I go with the epoch time. Every timestamp/date-time values is transfered as Unix timestamp.

Reasons:

  • the Elm application needs to frequently calculate with these values to render the current waiting time etc. This is better if there are numbers without requiring to parse dates first
  • Since the UI is written with Elm, it's probably good to adopt their style